<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul</title>
	<link>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-200</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-200</guid>
					<description>I will be covering all of the points you brought up in the article I plan on writing.

For now, let me just address your last claim: "Don’t you realize that with Saddam Hussein out of power, it’s now easier for mission work to go on there?"

This is, unfortunately, not necessarily true.  The plight of Christians has gotten much worse since the U.S. invasion.  Certainly, Christians suffered under Hussein's rule, but they were generally tolerated and allowed to worship freely.

Since the invasion, Islamic fundamentalism (non-existent under Hussein's secular regime) has become much more prominent. Islamic extremists have targeted churches, liquor stores, and the Christian owners of such stores. They harass Christian women who don't shroud themselves in black.

In an interview on CNN, Father Arkan Yako complained that the Kurds deny jobs to Christians unless they first join a Kurdish party. He said that Christians "are third or fourth class citizens in our own country."

As a result, thousands of Christians have fled Iraq, despite the fact that Hussein is no longer in power.

There are hundreds of examples I could share . . for now, let this excerpt from an article in National Review suffice:

"On Tuesday, according to the Catholic press outlet, Fides, Islamic fanatics broke into a Chaldean Catholic home near Mosul and killed a ten-year-old boy while shouting, "We've come to exterminate you. This is the end for you Christians!" In prior weeks, ChaldoAssyrian workers were murdered for "collaborating" with the United States. Three others were kidnapped and beheaded. Christian girls were assaulted with acid for not wearing the veil. A Chaldean Catholic priest was forced at gunpoint in his church to convert to Islam. Christian homes were targeted by mortar attacks that killed and injured children sleeping in their beds." 


One last thing.  If you were to familiarize yourself with the people I mentioned above, you would find that these are not people who capitulate to liberal caterwauling on any issue.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be covering all of the points you brought up in the article I plan on writing.</p>
<p>For now, let me just address your last claim: &#8220;Don&#8217;t you realize that with Saddam Hussein out of power, it&#8217;s now easier for mission work to go on there?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is, unfortunately, not necessarily true.  The plight of Christians has gotten much worse since the U.S. invasion.  Certainly, Christians suffered under Hussein&#8217;s rule, but they were generally tolerated and allowed to worship freely.</p>
<p>Since the invasion, Islamic fundamentalism (non-existent under Hussein&#8217;s secular regime) has become much more prominent. Islamic extremists have targeted churches, liquor stores, and the Christian owners of such stores. They harass Christian women who don&#8217;t shroud themselves in black.</p>
<p>In an interview on <span class="caps">CNN</span>, Father Arkan Yako complained that the Kurds deny jobs to Christians unless they first join a Kurdish party. He said that Christians &#8220;are third or fourth class citizens in our own country.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a result, thousands of Christians have fled Iraq, despite the fact that Hussein is no longer in power.</p>
<p>There are hundreds of examples I could share . . for now, let this excerpt from an article in National Review suffice:</p>
<p>&#8220;On Tuesday, according to the Catholic press outlet, Fides, Islamic fanatics broke into a Chaldean Catholic home near Mosul and killed a ten-year-old boy while shouting, &#8220;We&#8217;ve come to exterminate you. This is the end for you Christians!&#8221; In prior weeks, ChaldoAssyrian workers were murdered for &#8220;collaborating&#8221; with the United States. Three others were kidnapped and beheaded. Christian girls were assaulted with acid for not wearing the veil. A Chaldean Catholic priest was forced at gunpoint in his church to convert to Islam. Christian homes were targeted by mortar attacks that killed and injured children sleeping in their beds.&#8221;</p>
<p>One last thing.  If you were to familiarize yourself with the people I mentioned above, you would find that these are not people who capitulate to liberal caterwauling on any issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-199</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 06:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-199</guid>
					<description>If war is a "more liberal" position, why don't more liberals support it? From the information George W. Bush had, he didn't have much choice but to oust Saddam Hussein, and the only way to do that is through war. The reason Bush declared war was because he had reason to believe that Hussein had WMD. His intelligence agencies told him that, MI-5 told him that, and Bill Clinton seemed to believe it (maybe that should've given it away), otherwise he wouldnt've tried to bomb Iraq. Saddam even used some of those weapons in the past, not to mention wouldn't cooperate with weapons inspectors. Contrary to popular belief,  this is not the "War on Al-Qaeda" or the "War on Osama Bin Laden", this is the "War on terror", so Bush must fight anyone deemed as a terrorist.

I also believe we must look at this from a humanitarian angle. Is it "more conservative" to condone rape, torture, and mass murder, all things we now know Saddam was guilty of? And did you know many of the people over there have electricity and running water (among other things) for the first time?  Also, are you a Christian or just a "conservative"? Don't you realize that with Saddam Hussein out of power, it's now easier for mission work to go on there?

As for those conservatives you listed as now opposing the war effort, it wouldn't be the first time that conservatives had capitulated to liberal caterwauling. It's too late to express reservation now; pulling out right now would only make things worse.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If war is a &#8220;more liberal&#8221; position, why don&#8217;t more liberals support it? From the information George W. Bush had, he didn&#8217;t have much choice but to oust Saddam Hussein, and the only way to do that is through war. The reason Bush declared war was because he had reason to believe that Hussein had <span class="caps">WMD</span>. His intelligence agencies told him that, MI-5 told him that, and Bill Clinton seemed to believe it (maybe that should&#8217;ve given it away), otherwise he wouldnt&#8217;ve tried to bomb Iraq. Saddam even used some of those weapons in the past, not to mention wouldn&#8217;t cooperate with weapons inspectors. Contrary to popular belief,  this is not the &#8220;War on Al-Qaeda&#8221; or the &#8220;War on Osama Bin Laden&#8221;, this is the &#8220;War on terror&#8221;, so Bush must fight anyone deemed as a terrorist.</p>
<p>I also believe we must look at this from a humanitarian angle. Is it &#8220;more conservative&#8221; to condone rape, torture, and mass murder, all things we now know Saddam was guilty of? And did you know many of the people over there have electricity and running water (among other things) for the first time?  Also, are you a Christian or just a &#8220;conservative&#8221;? Don&#8217;t you realize that with Saddam Hussein out of power, it&#8217;s now easier for mission work to go on there?</p>
<p>As for those conservatives you listed as now opposing the war effort, it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time that conservatives had capitulated to liberal caterwauling. It&#8217;s too late to express reservation now; pulling out right now would only make things worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-195</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-195</guid>
					<description>There is a fairly sizable group of conservatives who object to the war in Iraq and who do not blindly follow Republican party leadership, etc.

Some of these conservatives include Pat Buchanan, Doug Bandow, Joe Sobran, Paul Schroeder, and Ron Paul (among others).

Not familiar with those names?  You should be. ; )

Even William Buckley, who originally supported the war effort, has since publically expressed strong reservations about it.

It is extremely unfortunate that the "conservative" position today has become equated with pro-war fervor.

In a future article (perhaps as early as next issue) I hope to explain why opposing the war in Iraq is the truly conservative position while supporting it is, in fact, a much more liberal position.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a fairly sizable group of conservatives who object to the war in Iraq and who do not blindly follow Republican party leadership, etc.</p>
<p>Some of these conservatives include Pat Buchanan, Doug Bandow, Joe Sobran, Paul Schroeder, and Ron Paul (among others).</p>
<p>Not familiar with those names?  You should be. ; )</p>
<p>Even William Buckley, who originally supported the war effort, has since publically expressed strong reservations about it.</p>
<p>It is extremely unfortunate that the &#8220;conservative&#8221; position today has become equated with pro-war fervor.</p>
<p>In a future article (perhaps as early as next issue) I hope to explain why opposing the war in Iraq is the truly conservative position while supporting it is, in fact, a much more liberal position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-192</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 06:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-192</guid>
					<description>Wait, how does opposing the war in Iraq make Ron Paul "the most conservative member of Congress"? It's mainly liberals who are opposed to it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, how does opposing the war in Iraq make Ron Paul &#8220;the most conservative member of Congress&#8221;? It&#8217;s mainly liberals who are opposed to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: S.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-190</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.virtuemag.org/articles/ron-paul#comment-190</guid>
					<description>This is a great article, Derek!  I became acquainted with Congressman Paul through the John Birch Society's magazine, The New American.  He is the only Congressman to consistently receive a 100% grading in their Conservative index, which measures how each member of Congress voted constitutionally.  There are a few other Congressmen I support, such as our own Dr. Tom Coburn, but I have more confidence in Mr. Paul than anyone in the entire United States government.  We need more like him.  What a great subject for this publication!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article, Derek!  I became acquainted with Congressman Paul through the John Birch Society&#8217;s magazine, The New American.  He is the only Congressman to consistently receive a 100% grading in their Conservative index, which measures how each member of Congress voted constitutionally.  There are a few other Congressmen I support, such as our own Dr. Tom Coburn, but I have more confidence in Mr. Paul than anyone in the entire United States government.  We need more like him.  What a great subject for this publication!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
